Changing Trends in Communicable Diseases: Implications for Global Health

When I was reading the article by Peeling, "Rapid tests for sexually transmitted infections (STIs): the way foward," this stuck with me:

"Recognising the tremendous burden of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and the lack of access to laboratory diagnositc services in the developing world, in 1993 the Rockefeller Foundation posted a prize of US$1 million for the development of an inexpensive rapid simple test to detect genital chlamydial or gonococcal infection. The prize was never claimed and was withdrawn in 1998. In stark contrast, ultra sensitive and specific assays such as nucleic acid amplified tests were developed and became widely and effectively used in the developed world to screen for these infections and facilitate treatment."

Why is it that even money doesnt appeal to the greedy to help the developing world?

Yes I understand prevention and control of STIs in the developing world is rather complex and multidimensional, but why is it that according to the 2004 World Development Report lack of access and unaffordability are two major reasons why laboratory services fail which I see simple and direct solutions for. People in the developed world needs to stop being greedy and share the wealth and luxuries many take for granted. I am in full support of the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Diagnostics Initiative (SDI).

I really like Jeffrey Sachs' quote "Life doesn't come with one problem neatly separated from the rest. Specialization is helpful, but you've got to see the web."

I also am a strong believer in the Pro-Poor Package. Even though there are areas of concern with the package, I feel the package was creatively designed and the benefits outweigh the risks.

I am all for the holistic approach! :o)